Dioscorides' Plants, Then and Now
EthnoHack 2026 · Ethnopharmacology research prototype

The plants that founded Western pharmacy, mapped then and now

What we stand to lose, and where to save it.

Dioscorides compiled De Materia Medica in the 1st century CE; it shaped European pharmacy for more than 1,500 years. Many of its plants still grow wild in Greece. We model where 32 of them live today, where they could survive in 2050, and where they could be cultivated instead.

Then
Book III, ch. 32
δίκταμνον
Photograph of Origanum dictamnus
Photo: Peter A. Mansfeld · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons (photo of Cretan dittany)
Now · 2050
2050 · moderate
Natural Earth (PD) · model output · ~10 km cells
Loading map layers (0 of 1)
Cretan dittany, modelled range under 2050 moderate emissions.
Species modelled
32
Climate futures
2 scenarios × 3 climate models
Lose wild habitat by 2050
11 of 32 · all 3 models agree
Candidate farmland by 2050
16 plants · outside Natura 2000
Historical identifications
115 claims since 1530
The finding

Which plant Dioscorides meant moves 5 of 32 plants in or out of the top 10

9 of our plants have disputed identifications. We modelled all 19 rival species that the cited scholarship names for them (another 16 have too few records in Greece to model) with the same data, models and climate futures, and re-ranked all 32 plants once per alternative. Depending on the identification, Stinging nettle enters the top 10 and St John's wort, Hyssop, Prickly juniper (eastern) and Cretan mountain tea drop out. For 4 of the 9 disputed plants, their own place in the top 10 depends on the identification. Modelled as Paeonia peregrina, Wild peonies of Greece would rank first, above dittany (published rank 5; that model rests on 69 records).

See every rival identification, with its source
The headline plant

Cretan dittany ranks first and has almost nowhere to be grown instead

Its identification is certain, it grows only in Greece, and under moderate emissions its climate range changes by −58% by 2050 (−24 to −81% across 3 climate models). Candidate farmland for it in 2050: 17 km² (0–210 km²). Its model only just beats a distance-only baseline (AUC 0.961 vs 0.959), so treat the map as a hypothesis.

For judges: a 60-second path

  1. 1. The findingWhich plant Dioscorides meant changes the ranking.
  2. 2. Cretan dittanyRank 1, its range, its single farmland cell.
  3. 3. IdentificationEvery rival species, re-ranked with sources.
  4. 4. MethodsData, validation, baseline, limits.
Across all 32 plants

A split future, not a uniform decline

Under moderate emissions, 11 of 32 plants lose wild habitat by 2050 in every climate model we ran, while 21 keep or gain it (median change across all plants +16%). The losers are concentrated at the top of the risk ranking (10 of the top 10), and they include plants Greece is known for: Cretan dittany, Hyssop, Marsh mallow, Cretan mountain tea. Averages hide this, so we report each plant, with its spread across models.

Most at risk

Top 5 of 32 by combined risk score. Ranks are uncertain too; the interval comes from 1,000 random weightings.

All 32 plants
  1. No. 1 (1–23)High
    δίκταμνον
    Cretan dittany
    Origanum dictamnus
    CertainGreek endemic
    Risk score
    0.62 (0.48–0.71)
    Range change, 2050 moderate
    −58% (−24 to −81%)
    View Cretan dittany, risk High
  2. No. 2 (1–3)Elevated
    ὕσσωπος
    Hyssop
    Hyssopus officinalis
    DisputedLow-confidence model
    Risk score
    0.57 (0.52–0.59)
    Range change, 2050 moderate
    −69% (−57 to −74%)
    View Hyssop, risk Elevated
  3. No. 3 (2–10)Elevated
    ἀλθαία
    Marsh mallow
    Althaea officinalis
    Probable
    Risk score
    0.54 (0.51–0.56)
    Range change, 2050 moderate
    −62% (−55 to −68%)
    View Marsh mallow, risk Elevated
  4. No. 4 (3–7)Elevated
    σιδηρῖτις
    Cretan mountain tea / ironwort
    Sideritis syriaca
    DisputedLow-confidence model
    Risk score
    0.49 (0.42–0.50)
    Range change, 2050 moderate
    −50% (−32 to −52%)
    View Cretan mountain tea / ironwort, risk Elevated
  5. No. 5 (1–7)Elevated
    γλυκυσίδη
    Wild peonies of Greece
    Paeonia L.
    Disputed
    Risk score
    0.44 (0.41–0.51)
    Range change, 2050 moderate
    −24% (−17 to −41%)
    View Wild peonies of Greece, risk Elevated
Headline plant

Cretan dittany, now and in 2050

Origanum dictamnus · projected range change under moderate emissions −58% (−24 to −81%)

Open the plant page
Current climate
Natural Earth (PD) · model output · ~10 km cells
Loading map layers (0 of 1)
Now. Modelled from the 1970-2000 climate baseline.
2050 · moderate emissions
Natural Earth (PD) · model output · ~10 km cells
Loading map layers (0 of 1)
2050, moderate emissions. Kept, lost and gained habitat, with candidate cultivation zones.
Range keptLost by 2050Gained by 2050Cultivation zoneOccurrences aggregated to ~10 km cells; exact locations are withheld to protect wild populations.

Ways in

Thirty-two plants, from Dioscorides' text to a 2050 map

Sort by risk, filter by endemism or identification confidence, and open any plant for its source chapter, model and caveats.

Explore the plants